Thoughts from the Train - The Election Campaign So Far

So I'm on the train heading to Sydney and I thought I would put down some thoughts on the election campaign so far.

  • First off, what the hell happened to running an election based on the idealogical differences between the parties? Right now we have a choice between a party that is hesitant about doing anything to tackle climate change, is happy to play on peoples ill informed fears of a miniscule group of people and is happy to simply follow the polls, and a party that is hesitant to do anything to tackle climate change, plays on peoples fears of a miniscule group of people and is happy to play to the polls.
  • Please tell me I'm not the only one who's sick of being treated like a moron by the parties? Are we, as a country so backwards that we can't be trusted with big words and actual explanations of policies?
  • On that note, does anyone expect the proposed Leaders debate to be an actual debate or just talking points at ten paces. If it's going to be the latter then I think I'll switch off. I'm pretty sure that the debate between Jimmy Smits and Alan Aldas characters on West Wing has spoiled all real life political debates for me.
  • Enforced preference deals truly suck. Parties should not be in a position where they get to direct your preferences. The senate voting system should be changed to remove the need for above/below the line voting and optional preferencing should be introduced.

Well that's my thoughts from the train for this morning.

Comments

Yes, I think the West Wing debate has ruined all real life political debates.  After all, it had some substance as opposed to what we see at the moment in Australia.

Exactly.

The debate in the West Wing featured facts, cogent arguments and rebuttals, everything that a real life debate lacks.